Reports Jan 14, 2019 | 9:37 AMby Colin McGourty

Tata Steel 2019, 2: The Dutch strike back

Anish Giri won his third game in a row against Vladimir Kramnik while Jorden van Foreest outplayed Jan-Krzysztof Duda in time trouble as the two Dutch representatives scored comeback wins in Round 2 of the Tata Steel Masters. The other games were drawn, making it 19 classical draws in a row for Magnus Carlsen, who enjoyed what he called a “brief but exciting” sacrificial battle against Ian Nepomniachtchi. Sam Shankland once again came agonisingly close to a win, but was left to regret that pawns can’t move backwards at the end of a 7-hour struggle against Richard Rapport.

Never trust your opponent... | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

You can replay all the Tata Steel Masters games using the selector below:

Our commentary duo of Jan Gustafsson and Peter Svidler stuck around to the bitter end!

Go Premium to watch Jan and Peter live for all 13 rounds of Tata Steel. Now’s a great time to try it out as the voucher code TATA2019 will give you 30% off all subscriptions!

Dutch courage

Team Giri before the round - his seconds Vidit and Erwin l'Ami are also both playing in Wijk aan Zee | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

“After yesterday’s disaster today was another one, so I was ready for it, mentally,” was how Anish Giri summed up the outcome of the opening against Vladimir Kramnik. The Russian former World Champion played a reversed Sveshnikov (with the white pieces, not the black), cleverly prepared the advance of his f-pawn and would have had great chances to bring the game to its logical conclusion if he’d made a different choice on move 19:

19.g3! would have upped the pressure on the black king, but instead Kramnik went for what Giri called a “very bad move”, 19.e5?!

I was very happy when he played e5, because now already I saw the contours of this Petrosian exchange sacrifice, and I thought to myself that probably I’m going to lose anyway, but whereas yesterday I played like a drunk Tal today I’ll play like a drunk Petrosian - something to find some joy after losing two games. But then I didn’t even lose it, so I was very happy!

The exchange sac appeared after 19…b6 20.Bf3 Ba6 21.Rf2 c5!?

Giri, and the computers, think Kramnik should have taken the rook on a8, but instead he picked this moment to go 22.g3?, a move that should almost lose on the spot against 22…cxd4 or 22…Rc8. Giri instead played 22…fxg3!?, admitting that was connected with a blunder. It seems he’d missed that after 23.Rxg3 cxd4 24.cxd4 if he now plays 24…Qxd4 there’s 25.e6! Instead after 24…Rc8 Kramnik once more burned his bridges with 25.Qf5?!

The threat is the beautiful 26.Qxf7+ Kxf7 27.Bd5#, but as Giri commented:

As he saw me blundering one trick he was hoping I’d blunder another with Qxf7 and a very nice discovered checkmate, but usually after a player blunders one trick he gets the focus back and doesn’t want to blunder a second one.

Giri’s 25…Bc4! stopped White’s fun, and if one last position sums up the game it’s the one that came after 30…Nf4!:

Black “blunders” White’s one idea of 31.Bf8, but in that case Black can simply give up his queen with 31…Rxf8 for a crushing position. Kramnik tried to play on with 31.Rd4, but his achievements for the rest of the game were limited to making it to the time control while playing on increment. He finally resigned on move 42, with a two pawn deficit the least of his worries.

It’s been a remarkable turnaround for Giri in his encounters with Kramnik, with Anish putting it down to a decline in the quality of play of an opponent he seconded for the Berlin Candidates:

It’s quite remarkable, because I lost to him 7 games in a row, not counting the draws (there were not many draws, I pretty much lost 7 games in a row), and then I won the last 3, which was remarkable. I think it’s mostly to do with the fact that his level clearly dropped, and I sort of saw that as well. Basically today it was in his hands – he could have won it. Back in the day he would win it – he would go g3 instead of e5, but ok, it’s normal, people age and of course occasionally he’ll play a brilliant game, but overall his level probably dropped.

Watch Anish Giri talk about the game and also his defeat the day before:

He could also get back on track in trolling Magnus, who for the second day in a row had given the impression in a post-game interview that he thought his opponent was Giri:

One player who certainly isn’t on the decline is 20-year-old Polish Grandmaster Jan-Krzysztof Duda, but on Sunday he fell to defeat against 19-year-old Jorden van Foreest. 

Duda-Van Foreest in Wijk aan Zee | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

The lesson the Dutchman seemed to have derived from his loss to Vishy Anand the day before was “play the Caro-Kann”, but he wasn’t thrilled with how the opening went:  

I thought I was much worse in the early middlegame, and then I got into time trouble, and somehow I survived.

Perhaps the loss the day before had hit his confidence, since it seems that although the position was balanced on a knife-edge it was never clearly in White’s favour. In fact White was almost obliged to give mate to justify structural weaknesses, but there was no obvious path to do that, and in mutual time trouble it was Jorden who emerged on top:

If the White pawn was already on g5 Jan-Krzysztof would be winning, but after 38…g5! Black is better everywhere. 39.Qh2 Nd2 40.Rc3 (accelerating the end) 40…Qa4! and the white cause was already hopeless, though resignation only finally came on move 50. Things are looking up for Jorden!

It feels great and especially because it came so unexpectedly – I thought I would lose.

How sure are we Duda wasn’t drinking beer on the job? 

Five very different draws

Mamedyarov-Radjabov ended in a 12th straight draw between the two Azerbaijan players, though at least on the outside it looked like an interesting tactical skirmish in the early middlegame before it fizzled out later.

Shakhriyar Mamedyarov hasn't got going yet this year | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

Ding Liren-Vidit featured a move 6 novelty from the Chinese no. 1 and an immensely complicated early middlegame which, as they say, “would repay further study”. For now, here’s Vidit on the game:

Anand-Fedoseev warmed Peter Svidler’s heart, since it was, “a rare case of me and the boys having done some work which stands the test of time!" All the way up to 17.Bf4 in a Petroff the players were following Svidler-Ivanchuk from Linares/Morelia 2007:

Peter explained the point of going for this ending with White is that Black would be fine if he controlled the b8-square, but since the bishop targets that square White can dream of a queenside pawn advance with moves such as a4, b4 and b5. Fedoseev’s 17…Rfc8 instead of Ivanchuk’s 17…Rfe8 was the first new move, but although the struggle was tense it was eventually agreed drawn on move 34 in a knight ending with equal pawns.

The jacket came off early | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

Carlsen-Nepomniachtchi once more lit up the early stages of the round, since almost before we knew it Magnus had managed to sacrifice another exchange:

The speed was the one thing that dampened the enthusiasm, however. Ian Nepomniachtchi said he hadn’t expected 1.d4 but he was still able to draw on some preparation he’d done for the f3-Grünfeld when he played it against Levon Aronian two years ago in the same venue. He remembered the key move 20…f5!

Of course from a human point of view if you see this position for the first time it looks like Black is in some kind of big trouble - two bishops, weak dark squares and so on, but in fact this idea with f5 – I quickly create a weakness on d5…

Magnus commented, “Frankly speaking, I didn’t remember that much apart from that the exchange sac was supposed to be playable,” and claimed, “I was probably bluffing just a tad” about the speed of his play. The game featured one more very memorable moment:

There’s nothing wrong with 28.Nxf1, but Magnus here went for another sac with 28.bxa6!?, when after 28…Nxg3 29.hxg3 White is down a rook for 3 pawns. One of those pawns is close to queening, but the excitement proved very short-lived. Magnus:

First I was excited to see this idea of the rook sac, but then when he had 29…Rb8 I quickly calmed down and realised it was just a pretty dead-drawn position left.

Black gives back a piece – 30.Rxb8 Rxb8 31.Bxf6 and after 31…Ra8 32.Nd1 the players shook hands. 

Nepomniachtchi and Carlsen both seem happy with the start to the tournament | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

Ian was happy to have ended up with 1.5/2 after facing the players who tied for first a year ago, with Black, in the first two rounds:

Ding Liren has his own record of 100 games unbeaten, and this year I already have my record of two games unbeaten, so that’s something, yeah?

And here’s Carlsen’s take on the game:

That leaves the game that kept our commentators busy for 7 hours and meant there was no time for a recap video: Rapport-Shankland. Up to a point the game was relatively symmetrical and standard, and then came 13.c4?!

Despite the chaos Richard Rapport subsequently tried to sow on the board Sam Shankland methodically went about probing the white weaknesses and it would have been some kind of poetic justice if his move here had been a clear win:

50…Nxc4?! looks like punishment for pushing the c-pawn (although actually this is another c-pawn that started on b2!), but the unexpected 51.Bf2! suddenly meant that Sam would have to win the game all over again, in a very tricky 3 vs. 2 knight ending. 

It was a very tough day for Richard Rapport | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

Whether it was objectively drawn or not, by move 74 Black had a tablebase win, but 74…h5 spoiled everything:

The difference with 74…h6! seems to be that the black king still has the h5-square and can break the fortress of a knight on g6 and a white pawn on h4 that we later saw in the game.

With the pawn still on h6 Black wins the h-pawn with Kh5

After 6 hours of play that mistake was completely understandable, although you could certainly question the US star only allocating 2 of his remaining 25 minutes to such a crucial decision. In the game Black could only win the h4-pawn at the cost of giving up the pawn on c4, and Rapport had no difficulty in holding a 94-move, 7-hour draw. That’s already two missed chances in Wijk aan Zee for Sam, but he’s certainly making his opponents work!

Keymer and Maghsoodloo win

Surprisingly there were also only two wins in the Challengers:

That was a surprise, since Praggnanandhaa and in particular Lucas van Foreest had to fight back from what looked hopeless positions against Vladislav Kovalev and Dinara Saduakassova. 

13-year-old Praggnanandhaa managed to avoid starting with two defeats | photo: Alina l'Ami, official website

The wins came for 14-year-old German Vincent Keymer, who convincingly beat the lowest seed Stefan Kuipers, and Parham Maghsoodloo, who bounced back from his loss the day before to beat Elisabeth Paehtz. She put up stiff resistance, but 56.g5+! was a nice final touch from the World Junior Champion:

If the black king goes to a light square Parham will pick up material with check, and if it goes to a dark square he can finish in style with a knight fork – e.g. 56…Kg7 57.Qxd8! Qxd8 58.Ne6+. Instead Elisabeth resigned.

So we still have two leaders in the Tata Steel Masters, Ian Nepomniachtchi and Vishy Anand on 1.5/2, and their Round 3 games will certainly be ones to watch: Nepomniachtchi-Kramnik and Shankland-Anand. Vidit-Carlsen is another intriguing tie, so be sure to tune into all the action here on chess24 with Jan and Peter from 13:20 CET onwards: Tata Steel Masters | Challengers

See also:

Sort by Date Descending Date Descending Date Ascending Most Liked Receive updates

Comments 3

Guest 12614709682
Join chess24
  • Free, Quick & Easy

  • Be the first to comment!


Create your free account now to get started!

By clicking ‘Register’ you agree to our terms and conditions and confirm you have read our privacy policy, including the section on the use of cookies.

Lost your password? We'll send you a link to reset it!

After submitting this form you'll receive an email with the reset password link. If you still can't access your account please contact our customer service.

Which features would you like to enable?

We respect your privacy and data protection guidelines. Some components of our site require cookies or local storage that handles personal information.

Show Options

Hide Options