Reports Oct 26, 2016 | 11:46 PMby Colin McGourty

Russian Superfinal 9-10: Kosteniuk wins car

Alexander Kosteniuk has dominated the Russian Women's Championship from start to finish | photo: Russian Chess Federation

Alexandra Kosteniuk has won her second Russian Women’s Championship 11 years after she picked up her first in 2005. She did it with a round to spare after two hair-raising wins in a row, saying afterwards that the fact the winner would also receive a car boosted her motivation… but she still needs to arrange a Russian driving licence! In the men’s event nothing is decided, though Vladimir Fedoseev has joined Alexander Riazantsev in the lead. Peter Svidler is still in with a chance, and once again shared his adventures with us in brilliant post-mortems.

Alexandra Kosteniuk has dominated this year’s Russian Women’s Championship, and with 7 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss now leads by 1.5 points with a single round to go. You can replay all the games using the selector below (and hover over a player’s name to see all her results):

The final two rounds were a triumph of determination over nerves, though they could both have ended very differently:

If Ekaterina Ubiennykh had played 36.fxe6! she could have won in beautiful style. The e2-rook can be given up since after 36…Nf4+ 37.Kh1! Nxe2 38.Rf7+ the white rook and bishops will pick off the black pieces at will. Instead after 36.Rg4? Nf4+ 37.Rxf4 Qxf4 38.fxe6 the black king was able to find a refuge on e7, with the e2-rook powerless to influence the game.

Kosteniuk's siege finally worked against Ovod just when it seemed to have collapsed | photo: Alexey Ziler

Round 10 was even more dramatic. Alexandra lay siege to Evgenija Ovod’s position and organised no less than four pieces to attack the weak black pawn on f7. Somehow it survived, and Evgenija ultimately had real winning chances as her passed a-pawn began to run. It ran too fast, though, and Kosteniuk seized her chance!

61.Rxc4! dxc4 62.Nxc4 Qb3 63.Nxa3 The position was equal, but Kosteniuk managed to use the weakness of the black king to win material and eventually emerge victorious in a tricky queen vs. rook and pawns ending.

Natalija Pogonina (wins over Gunina and Kashlinskaya) and Anastasia Bodnaruk (a draw with Girya and win over Goryachkina) pushed Alexandra all the way, but she had made it over the finish line first. She’ll take home the roughly 7,250 euros first prize as well as a Renault Captur car worth more than that. Kosteniuk, who no longer lives in Russia, revealed she’d been learning the Russian rules of the road, but still had to pass a medical with a neurologist – given the nerves of the final two rounds she said she’d better delay that a little!

Kosteniuk: "If the worst comes to the worst my husband (GM Pavel Tregubov) can drive"

Meanwhile in the men’s section we could hardly be further from knowing the winner… eight players go into Thursday’s final round within a point of the leaders Vladimir Fedoseev and Alexander Riazantsev, after the drawing sequence went on:

Although a single win in Rounds 9 and 10 wasn’t a full reflection of the amount of action we witnessed, it’s probably not much of an exaggeration to say that Peter Svidler’s post-mortems – revealing what really goes through the head of a supergrandmaster during a game – have been the best part of the men’s event. He didn’t disappoint with his 9th and 10th post-mortems, taking up a frankly ridiculous 102 minutes between them:

The fan verdict has been pretty unanimous:

Both games were hugely dramatic, with Peter describing the first one as, “Perhaps the most lost position I haven’t lost in my life – it would be at least fair to nominate it for that shortlist”. Needing a win with so few rounds remaining Svidler played an offbeat opening, and had more or less survived it when he got to play 16…Bd5:

Over to Svidler:

That was the first time in the game where I felt that my opening choice probably wasn’t such a stupid idea. I did get almost exactly what I wanted to get out of the game today, namely a very unclear, playable position which is not that easy to evaluate, but it seems double-edged, and I think this feeling that the worst is over played a trick on me here, because for a while I think I was wildly over-optimistic in the evaluation of the resulting structure.

Ten moves later Peter burned his bridges with 26…f5?! only to realise that he was in deep trouble shortly afterwards. Another ten moves later and Bocharov’s 36.Ne1! was the moment when it dawned on our man that the b4-pawn probably wasn’t long for this world:

What followed was an ending that should have been a relatively easy win for White, but with Dmitry soon playing on increments it eventually developed into a crazy war of nerves, with Svidler summing up that, “the remainder of the game honestly does feel like we were just clicking buttons”.

Peter Svidler living dangerously... | photo: Alexey Ziler

One or two gilt-edged chances passed Peter by until the final twist came on move 70:

70.Ke3! Bxg3 71.g7 Rg1 72.c8=Q+! Kxc8 73.g8=Q+ is still a win for Bocharov, but after 70.Kxf3? Rh3! the draw was unavoidable.

This girl had come with the perfect top with which to troll the grandmasters | photo: Alexey Ziler

Elsewhere it was a curious day, with Alexander Grischuk surprising Evgeny Tomashevsky with 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.b3 and then getting his opponent to think for 10 minutes on move 4 with an even more unusual choice. Grischuk came close to a win. 

Tomashevsky was looking suitably scared | photo: Alexey Ziler

That was nothing compared to Aleksey Goganov, who thought for ten minutes himself after 1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 Nd7 before playing 3.c4, a move that has the computer declaring that Black is better. Since Black was sole tournament leader Alexander Riazantsev that was potentially bad news for the chasing pack, and for a long time it looked as though Alexander would indeed win. Instead all six games ended drawn.

The game that almost saw Riazantsev open up a full point lead on the chasing pack | photo: Alexey Ziler

Round 10 featured one decisive game, Dmitry Bocharov’s fifth loss with the black pieces in Novosibirsk. It was a lot of fun, but Dmitry’s kingside attack in a Caro-Kann was no match for the extra queen Vladimir Fedoseev managed to organise on the queenside!

The game lasted a few more moves on inertia alone after the time control had passed, but there were simply more of White.

Chess fans could watch as Fedoseev showed his game using chess broadcast software developed here at chess24 | photo: Alexey Ziler

The game we had the best ringside seats for, of course, was Svidler’s encounter with 19-year-old Grigoriy Oparin. It featured some bold moves that had the computer, and some human observers, raising a quizzical eye:

Peter responded in quintessential style:

I understand why I did what I did and I’m reasonably happy with the reasoning. That wasn’t a particularly well-constructed sentence. I apologise for that.

His opprobrium was instead reserved for his opening preparation, which had involved a lot of thinking about playing the Najdorf, a eureka moment related to a position he could get in another opening, then not getting that position. Instead...

My opponent played a line he’d already played before, and I somehow forgot to check it properly, or improperly. Preparation did not go according to any kind of a manual.

The moment of truth came after 14…Rc8, when Peter decided he had to to do something to knock his conscientious young opponent out of his home preparation:

15.d5!? was what he came up with, going for activity before Black can untangle his queenside. It was opening up a Pandora’s box of tactics, but the 7-time Russian Champion welcomed that:

At the very least I’m creating a very concrete tactical skirmish that I should be able to properly calculate my way out of.

The move also achieved its other goal, since Grigoriy thought for 23 minutes. The bad news for Peter was that he played the best move after that, 15…Qf5!, but it was game on, with Svidler going on to show some truly beautiful tactics. He did it without having subjected the game to computer analysis:

After the preparation debacle, I didn’t really need more sad news in the shape of the computer completely refuting my beautiful sacrifices!

Well, there’s mixed news on that score. The computer isn’t a fan of the sacrifice Peter was talking about here – 18…dxc4 19.Nxe6!? fxe6 20.Rxe6:

The cynic suggests the mocking 20…Kh8!! and gives Black a 2-pawn advantage. There’s another move that Peter said, “would be the crowning glory of my previous play” – 18…a6 19.Rbd1 dxc4 20.Nxe6 b5 21.Nd8!!

The move is sound, not quite as strong as Peter had hoped, but certainly beautiful… it’s not easy to play like Tal in the computer age!

Winter has come to Siberia... | photo: Russian Chess Federation

So going into the final round things couldn’t be closer, especially since both leaders face tough opponents with the black pieces.

Tune in for live commentary (Men's | Women's) in English by Evgenij Miroshnichenko and Pavel Tregubov, two hours earlier than usual at 8am CEST (to rewatch earlier commentary check out ChessCast's Livestream page).

See also:

Sort by Date Descending Date Descending Date Ascending Most Liked Receive updates

Comments 11

Guest 4509775767
Join chess24
  • Free, Quick & Easy

  • Be the first to comment!


Create your free account now to get started!

I am aged 16 or older.

By clicking ‘Register’ you agree to our terms and conditions and confirm you have read our privacy policy, including the section on the use of cookies.

Lost your password? We'll send you a link to reset it!

After submitting this form you'll receive an email with the reset password link. If you still can't access your account please contact our customer service.

Data Consent Details

We respect your privacy and data protection guidelines.

Using chess24 requires the storage of some personal data, as set out below. You can find additional information in our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Disclaimer and Terms of Website Use. Please note that your data settings can be changed at any time by clicking on the Data Settings link in the footer at the bottom of our website.

data details

Necessary Data

Some data is technically necessary to be able to visit the page at all. A so-called cookie stores identifiers that make it possible to respond to your individual requests. It contains a session ID - a unique, anonymous user ID combined with an authentication identifier (user_data). A security identifier (csrf) is also stored to prevent a particular type of online attack. All of these fields are alpha-numeric, with almost no relation to your real identity. The only exception is that we monitor some requests with the IP address that you are currently using, so that we are able to detect malicious use or system defects. Additionally, a technical field is stored (singletab) to ensure that some interactions are only processed in the browser tab that is currently active. For example, a new chess game will not be opened in all your current tabs. We use your local storage to save the difference between your local clock and our server time (serverUserTimeOffset), so that we are able to display the date and time of events correctly for you. You can also enable more data fields, as described in the other sections. Your personal decision on which data storage to enable is also stored as necessary information (consent).

Settings Data

We offer a range of personal settings for your convenience. Options include which opponents you prefer to be paired against, your preferred chessboard and pieces, the board size, the volume setting of the video player, your preferred language, whether to show chat or chess notation, and more. You can use our web page without storing this data, but if you would like to have your individual settings remembered we recommend enabling this feature. For logged-in registered users this setting is mandatory to store information about your privacy settings, users you have blocked and your friendship settings. As a registered user we also store your data consent in these settings.

Social Media Data

We embed a Twitter feed showing activity for the hashtag #c24live and also make it possible to share content in social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and Google+. If you enable this option social networks are able to store data in your cookies or local storage for the purpose of these features.

Statistics Data

We would like to measure how our page is used with Google Analytics, so that we can decide which features to implement next and how to optimize our user experience. If you enable this feature Google will store your device identifiers and we will send tracking events (such as page requests) to Google Analytics. These have no direct relationship to your person except for the IP address currently being used.

Marketing Data

To help cover the cost of free services we would like to show you advertisements from our partner networks. Members of these networks store data on the banners shown to you and try to deliver ads that are relevant. If you choose not to allow this kind of data we have to show more anonymous advertisements and will be more limited in the free services we can offer.

Other Data

For registered users we store additional information such as profile data, chess games played, your chess analysis sessions, forum posts, chat and messages, your friends and blocked users, and items and subscriptions you have purchased. You can find this information in your personal profile. A free registration is not required to use this application. If you decide to contact the support team a ticket is created with information that includes your name and email address so that we can respond to your concern. This data is processed in the external service Zendesk. If you subscribe to a newsletter or are registered we would like to send you occasional updates via email. You can unsubscribe from newsletters and as a registered user you can apply several mail settings to control how your email address is used. For newsletters we transfer your email address and username to the external service MailChimp. If you buy content or subscriptions on chess24 we work with the payment service provider Adyen, which collects your payment data and processes information about the payment such as fraud protection data.