It’s two years since the first GRENKE Chess Classic was won by Viswanathan Anand ahead of Fabiano Caruana, but the weather hasn’t changed in the German spa town:
What has changed is that back then, with six players and ten
rounds, there wasn’t a single day on which all the games ended drawn. This time
round that record was broken on the very first day:
GRENKE Classic 2015 Round 1 results (click a result to replay the game with computer analysis)
It didn’t look like it was going to end that way, though, when after seeming to do the hard work David Baramidze suddenly drifted into difficulty against Etienne Bacrot. First he took on g6 with what looked like the wrong pawn (Short called 22…fxg6 “a shocking positional error”), and then the capture of another g-pawn with 26…hxg4 looked like curtains, though by this stage there were no easy solutions:
26-year-old David Baramidze qualified for this year’s GRENKE Chess Classic by finishing second in the 2014 all-German event and, at 2594, is rated at least 100 points below his opponents this year. He knew he was in for a tough test, although Jan Gustafsson pointed out it was even worse than that:
I don’t know if David realises this, but everyone but him is a current or previous Baden-Baden player, and the plan was to gang up on him!
Jan added, though, that David hadn’t read the script. It might be more accurate to say that Etienne forgot his lines, since at this point he “hallucinated” a mate, playing 27.Nce4 gxf3 28.Rh8+ Kg7 before realising that his planned 29.Rdh1?? would run into 29…Nd2+ and it’s actually Black who wins!
He was therefore obliged to take a draw by repetition.
Afterwards when David was asked about his goals for the tournament there was an amusing exchange:
Baramidze: I’m trying to survive the openings and play normal chess
Short: That’s normally Carlsen’s plan…
You can watch the full post-mortem below:
There were two draws that never quite caught fire, although the post-game interviews revealed that, as usual, we only saw the tip of the iceberg.
Fabiano Caruana opened with the “patriotic” Italian Game, and was perhaps a little taken aback when Nigel Short began the press conference with, “Your opening was a little bit flaccid”, to which an on-form Vishy Anand responded: “The English commentator is making his mark!”.
Caruana said 6.b4 was an over-the-board choice and then described his 10.h3?! as “probably unnecessary”. It could have led to some great entertainment, since Caruana pointed out he’d been very concerned about lines like 19…Bxh3 20.gxh3 Qh4 21.Kg2 and then the stunning 21…Rd2!!
Vishy quipped, “I reckon you would have fainted!”
But another exchange was relevant here:
Short: These are great tactics, and probably not working.
Anand: Like all great tactics!
Instead the game seemed to swing in Caruana’s favour after he took drastic measures to prevent White’s knight making it to c4 or another outpost:
20…Bxe3!? It looked risky, but as Jan Gustafsson commented on the live broadcast:
He has so many games when he just effortlessly draws with a knight and bishop vs. the two bishops. It doesn’t look like much until you try to do it yourself…
Sure enough, Vishy never looked in danger and a draw was agreed in a dead drawn position on move 38. Watch the post-game session below:
“Flaccid” would perhaps have been overly generous of the French Tarrasch opening that Michael Adams himself called “a bit dismal”.
He soon got into difficulty against Arkadij Naiditsch and the players both agreed that 14.g3?! was a bad move:
Naiditsch felt it was an invitation to play Nb4-d5 – “I don’t think I’m risking getting worse”. Sure enough, it was Arkadij who was doing the pressing, but Adams got down to work and felt he had his best 15-move sequence of the game when he started exchanging off pieces. It all looked headed to an early draw, but Naiditsch, who only had 2 draws in 10 games in the 2013 event, pressed on and on in a bid to ruin Adams’ evening. It was tricky, but the Englishman’s nerves held. He was succinct when asked afterwards about his goals for the rest of the tournament:
To play a little bit better than today!
It was noted that Naiditsch had won his last supertournament ten years ago in Dortmund in 2005. He added that he’d won the European U10 Championship a decade earlier in 1995, to which Jan helpfully chimed in with, “and you were born in 1985!” Is this Arkadij’s year?
Watch the full post-game press conference below:
And that leaves the day’s headline clash between World Champion Magnus Carlsen and the “the former world no. 2” (as he was christened by Jan) Levon Aronian.
The Armenian had said in an interview late last year that his favourite opponents are Kramnik and Carlsen, since, “they’re the most complex to play against, but I’m drawn to complexity”. Careful what you wish for, as today’s game was certainly complex, even if neither player could quite land a killer blow.
Carlsen described the opening as “not the most swashbuckling of lines”, but he ended up spending almost 40 minutes over 13…Nf6 and 14…Nfd7, later describing them as “stupid, but maybe good moves”. It was hard for both sides to play but suddenly with 27.g4! Aronian “was starting to get excited”:
When he later followed up with 34.e4! the black pieces were
being forced back into contorted positions. Carlsen:
I’m forced to put my pieces on some strange squares. Still it’s fairly solid, but a bit sucky.
Aronian was still in control with 36.Rg1:
But the way he played the move was the problem: “36.Rg1 was ok, but spending 7 out of my last 8 minutes on it…” After 36…Rd8 he played the “ridiculous” (Aronian’s word) 37.Qh2?! and the advantage was gone. It was just around this point that Jan had commented, “if Carlsen survives the next 3 moves he could well be better,” which proved prophetic, but once again, as often happens at the start of a supertournament, the defender was up to the task, and even the legendary torture techniques of the Norwegian couldn’t quite bring home a full point.
Replay the post-game commentary from the players below:
Round 2 starts once more at 15:00 CET on Tuesday, and sees the following pairings:
Jan pointed out that we have the four highest rated players playing the four lowest rated players, so, “it’s a pretty safe bet that there aren’t going to be four draws tomorrow”. If that’s not jinxing things, we don’t know what is… but here’s hoping!
Watch all the action live on chess24 with commentary by Jan Gustafsson and Nigel Short! You can also follow every move with our free mobile apps:
We respect your privacy and data protection guidelines. Some components of our site require cookies or local storage that handles personal information.